Three Kingdoms in Metaverse: Microsoft vs Meta

Three Kingdoms in Metaverse: Microsoft vs Meta

Although many technology companies claim they are Meta-verse companies, if you look through the fog of the Meta-verse, you can see that the metaverse industry already forms a tripod complexion.

The first year after Facebook changed its name to Meta, it plummeted 26%, and the market value directly wiped out nearly $250 billion, creating an enormous shrinkage in history. Not long ago, Microsoft acquired the game company, Activision Blizzard, for a staggering $68.7 billion, setting a record for the most significant gaming industry acquisition in history. So which three kingdoms are fighting each other in this Metaverse, and what kind of drama are they playing? Today, let’s start with Microsoft and Meta.

Metaverse became the top word in 2021; almost everyone knows it. So what exactly does it mean? Today I will tell you a straightforward way to understand it. In 99% of cases, **when you hear someone say “metaverse” to you, you replace the word “Metaverse” with “internet,” and it doesn’t affect the understanding of the sentence at all.

Zuckerberg is the most devoted to the Metaverse, so much so that he changed his company name from Facebook to Meta, which shows his determination to devote himself to the Metaverse and detonate the popularity of the Metaverse again.

Excluding the name change, Zuckerberg also plans to spend $180 billion to build the Meta metaverse over the next ten years. Not only are billions of people active on Zuckerberg’s Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp social networks every day, but he also owns the largest virtual reality company, Reality Labs. Everything looks good, but why doesn’t Wall Street buy it? Wouldn’t it be a logical path to metaverse for billions of users active on social networks to enter virtual reality gradually?

But Microsoft is likely to let Zuckerberg fail. Why? Let’s look at their distribution of power over a few fundamental elements that make up the Metaverse.

Game Engine

The first is the game engine, the building tool used to build the Metaverse. It is no exaggeration to say that game engines may be one of the most critical technologies of the next decade.

A game engine is simply a software tool for developing or running video games. Don’t think that this is something that is not elegant as soon as you hear a game. In fact, with the digital development of the world, game engines are entering all walks of life. Such as urban planning, architecture, automotive engineering, concerts, movies, etc., a lot of their work and design processes are gradually moving to Unreal Engine and Unity Engine.

For example, car dashboards with Unreal Engine, and digital twins, which have broad prospects in industries such as urban planning, engineering and construction, allow a real object to use its sensor data to create a replica in a virtual world. It looks the same, but it also behaves and responds to human interactions in the same way.

Think about it ten years later when looking back at a demo released by the Unreal five engine that amazed the whole network in 2020. Can you tell what is unreal and what is reality? And isn’t that precisely what the Metaverse wants to achieve?

Microsoft spent half of their cash buying Activision Blizzard does not intend to monopolize the gaming industry or let Xbox crush PS or Nintendo consoles. Because it is apparent that creating a monopoly in the game market is almost impossible. Sony and Tencent still occupy the top two positions, and the overall distribution is not very concentrated. What is a monopoly? In the market share of search engines, Google is a monopoly.

So Microsoft acquired Activision Blizzard for their metaverse strategy. Microsoft has been expanding its gaming empire, and in 2014, Microsoft acquired Minecraft for $2.5 billion.

In a not-so-cool demo, Zuckerberg showed everyone the future of the Metaverse, where you can play with friends, attend live shows, play games and even run a business, which is his blueprint for the future build. But in reality, a thriving metaverse already exists.

It is so powerful that millions of people spend hours on it every day. In this Metaverse, people have built countless custom worlds and created many profitable businesses and thousands of careers. This Metaverse is Minecraft.

Although Minecraft is not built on blockchain technology, it is decentralized. Everyone can develop their Metaverse. You can invite anyone you like to your world, and you can go to any world you want. It doesn’t use VR, AR, etc., but the pixel-style graphics create an incredibly immersive. When I stand on the roof in the sunset, I feel like bathing in the afterglow of the evening.

John Carmack, recently said: 1
 >Minecraft and Fortnite are closer to the metaverse than anything Facebook has built, or frankly, is likely to build, unless we wind up getting really lucky.

Judging by the current trend, the final metaverse form is likely to evolve from a game. Zuckerberg is in trouble because Meta does not have any larger game companies if this is the case.

Of course, the Metaverse may also evolve from another path, which is the virtual environment.

virtual environment

What is a virtual environment? We spend online every day in a virtual environment, such as Twitter, Instagram, Tiktok, etc. It is a virtual environment where people meet and exchange information. It’s just a two-dimensional space.

To upgrade this experience, put on VR equipment, enter a purely digital virtual world, put on AR glasses, enter a mixed world of the physical world and virtual world, such as the popular game a few years ago, Fairy Pokémon. In the future, the entire physical world is like a canvas, and we can digitally draw any entity.

This is where Zuckerberg’s Meta comes in. His VR glasses, Quest 2, continue to sell well, with sales exceeding 10 million. Continue to maintain the No. 1 position in the VR hardware market. Consumer spending in the Oculus content market has reached the $1 billion level.

And Horizon, a VR social platform that Zuckerberg called “the core of our metaverse vision” during the company’s earnings call, saw its monthly users grow tenfold to 300,000.

Of course, Horizon Worlds has only been in use for a few months, and it’s too early to tell if the platform will be able to grow quickly. But it’s really a valid path to the Metaverse.

Maybe we started using Horizon to have a remote meeting with a colleague, but soon we want to play some games on it, then we want to chat with friends for a while, then go shopping, and finally, all your life slowly migrates to the virtual world of Horizon, and the Metaverse came naturally.

So, can Meta beat Microsoft in virtual environments?

Horizon initially targeted enterprise users. The sudden remote work requirement has made the zoom software emerge. However, after all, zoom is still a two-dimensional environment, and the experience of opening a multi-person meeting is not good. Horizon Workrooms, which was first launched in 2021, is a three-dimensional collaborative environment.

Speaking of enterprise users, Microsoft has been targeting enterprise users since the 1970s. And now, Microsoft’s benchmarking product for Horizon is Microsoft’s team collaboration tool, Microsoft Teams, which Microsoft will upgrade to a VR environment.

If you like the zoom-style traditional meeting interface, Teams can provide a more interesting virtual avatar instead of showing your natural face, and you can also switch between VR, AR, and 2D space at will. Meanwhile, with Microsoft’s cross-device Mesh platform for AR, VR, mobile, and PC, “Teams” will slowly grow into an increasingly rich metaverse concept.

The virtual environment is the second factor of the Metaverse. Not to mention Microsoft’s accumulated experience in enterprise collaboration over the years, Microsoft’s Azure digital twin technology, the modelling technology and user experience reflected in games such as Microsoft Flight Simulator, etc., all make Meta’s victory difficult.

In addition to these two elements, the game engine and the virtual environment, the Metaverse also has spatial computing, content creation, and the virtual economy.

The most profound difference between the two companies, Meta and Microsoft, is their business models. Essentially, Meta or Facebook is an advertising company, while Microsoft is a software, services and content company.

Of course, even if our predictions are correct, that doesn’t necessarily mean Microsoft will win. The market is like a battlefield, ever-changing. Moreover, since it is the world of the Three Kingdoms, there is still a strong player in the Metaverse who is eyeing it. He is not Roblox, known as the first stock in the Metaverse, nor The Sandbox, or Decentraland, which sells lands like crazy, but Apple.

Apple is like a mirror image of Microsoft, a software and services company with a growing hardware business, while Apple is a hardware company with an extensive services business. As an enduring company, it will never be absent from the Metaverse. Let’s talk about Apple’s Metaverse in detail later.

  1. Obedkov, E. (2021, September 24). John Carmack: “Minecraft and Fortnite are closer to the metaverse than anything Facebook has built.” Game World Observer.

I’m Axton, an entrepreneur and a content creator. I believe in the power of delivering value to you, the reader. If you like this sharing please share it with one of your friends. You can also find me on Twitter and on my Chinese Blog

Read more

AI 智能体工作流:用 Dify 打造本地、开源长文翻译神器

AI 智能体工作流:用 Dify 打造本地、开源长文翻译神器

今天我们来完成一个既有挑战性又有启发性的任务:我们来使用开源的 AI 开发平台 Dify 创建一个高质量的 AI 翻译助手。同时我们可以学习一种可以应用于不同平台的通用的方法。 虽然现在的 AI 翻译比传统的机器翻译提升了很多,但是依然不够令人满意。这就是为什么我们今天要学习一种新的方法来提升翻译的质量。这种方法就是 AI 界大神吴恩达老师最新开源的反思工作流。简单来说它就是一种让 AI 对自己的输出结果进行思考并进一步改进的方法。 反思工作流它的具体步骤实际上就是三步法:先让一个 AI 进行初始翻译打一个草稿,然后再让第二个 AI 去挑毛病,然后再让第三个 AI 对草稿进行最终的优化,形成最后的翻译结果。这就相当于是一个团队作业,三个臭皮匠胜过诸葛亮。这个过程不仅能够提高翻译的准确性,还可以让翻译更加符合目标语言的表达习惯。 在上期智图派,Coze 复刻吴恩达开源 AI 翻译神器 | 「智图派」 当中我使用 Coze 平台来实现过这个翻译的工作流,今天我们将使用另外一个 AI 开发平台 Dify 来再次实现这个工作流。我们可以通过这次实例来学习到如何把同一套思想同一套工作流在不

lock-1 By Axton
Coze 复刻吴恩达开源 AI 翻译神器 | 「智图派」

Coze 复刻吴恩达开源 AI 翻译神器 | 「智图派」

AI 最大的应用场景之一,就是翻译。虽然说现在的 AI 翻译比以前的机器翻译好了很多,但是常常还是不够完美。不过现在呢,有一种超强的方法可以显著提升 AI 翻译的水准,这就是 AI 界大神,吴恩达 Andrew Ng 教授最新开源的「反思工作流」 它利用prompt engineering,让AI不仅能翻译,还能"思考"如何改进翻译!这意味着,无论你要翻译的文档有多专业、多复杂,都能得到一个高度定制化的优质翻译。我们可以先看一下翻译效果。 吴恩达老师的反思翻译核心思路 吴恩达老师的翻译工作流可以归纳为两个核心要点: 第一,采用"初始翻译-反思-优化"的三步迭代流程,不断改进翻译质量。首先使用一个 AI 进行初始的翻译,然后让另一个 AI 对初始的翻译结果进行思考和评判,找出可以改进的地方,最后,由第三个

lock-1 By Axton
Jina Reader API 的四种用法 | 「智图派」

Jina Reader API 的四种用法 | 「智图派」

构建知识库,或者分析各种文章数据,是大家使用 AI 很重要的一个应用场景,因此我们常常会需要用到爬虫去爬取某个网站上的内容,现在,Jina 推出了一款非常简单好用的获取网页内容的工具,你只要把网址给它,它就能把网页内容整理成很适合大语言模型使用的格式,简直是构建知识库的利器。今天我就给大家介绍四种用法。分别包括在自动化工作流中使用以及在 AI 智能体中使用。 Jina Reader API 的网址是 读取器 API,你可以直接输入你需要爬取内容的网址 URL 在这边进行测试,输入之后直接点击按钮「获取内容」,就可以在右边得到结果了。 而他的用法也很简单,就是把你需要爬取内容的网页的 URL 写在 的后面就可以了。 什么是 Reader API Reader 是将任何URL转换为LLM友好的输入,只需简单添加前缀 无需付费即可获得改进后的适用于智能体或 RAG 系统的输出。

lock-1 By Axton
Coze 工作流获取 Tweets 详解 | 「智图派」

Coze 工作流获取 Tweets 详解 | 「智图派」

Coze是一个可以不用代码来搭建AI聊天机器人的平台。我在这期视频当中已经详细地讲解了Coze的各种功能,以及如何用到GPT-4 Turbo的模型。感兴趣的朋友可以回看一下。 自从 Twitter 被马斯克买了之后,如果你想从 Twitter 网站的外面来获取推文信息,也就是用 Twitter API,就需要每个月充值100美元了。但是 Coze 却很大方地让你可以免费地用部分 Twitter API 的功能了。今天我就先给大家演示一个可以批量获取多个 Twitter 作者的推文的工作流,把这个工作流嵌入到你的 AI 聊天机器人里面。比如我这里加了两个 Twitter 账号,我的和马斯克的,这样就可以一次性地获取到我们两个人的推文了。 今天我首先给大家演示一下在 Coze 上可以用到的 Twitter API 的功能,然后再演示一下批量获取推文的工作流,最后我们再聊一聊 Coze 的局限性。 Plugins 的基本功能 getUsers 首先第一个 "get users"

lock-1 By Axton