NOTION vs ROAM vs OBSIDIAN vs LOGSEQ vs WORKFLOWY. Which one is better for book note?

NOTION vs ROAM vs OBSIDIAN vs LOGSEQ vs WORKFLOWY. Which one is better for book note?

Today I’ll compare the various note-taking apps that have emerged from the note-taking boom brought on by Roam, which will involve old note-taking apps like Notion, Workflowy, etc., and note-taking newcomers Roam, Obsidian, LogSeq, and so on.
Since this is a brief review, I won’t go into detail about their features. If you are struggling with which note-taking app to choose as your primary tool, I’m sure you’ve already seen countless feature descriptions, so there’s no point for me to go over the features in detail again.

The review is entirely out of subjective feelings. If there are mistakes, welcome to leave a comment. I often swing between different APPs, so even if I don’t think an APP is working well today, it doesn’t mean I won’t use it again in the future.
First of all, I have two requirements for the note-taking app: first, trust, which includes my belief that what I write will not be lost and that I can find it when I need it, and second, willingness to use it to write, which is a bit of a mystery and can be influenced by a combination of the note app’s UI, functionality and performance. In short, some APPs can make you concentrate on writing, while some APPs make you want to play the APP all the time.


Notion has two biggest advantages. The first is that it looks beautiful. For example, in the list of excerpts exported from Readwise, Notion’s UI is more pleasing to the eye than Obsidian’s UI.

Secondly it is a note-taking app with the most powerful database features. Therefore, I use Notion mainly just for project management and information management. Its Kanban view, timeline view, etc., are suitable for simple project management. And for information management, such as which services have been subscribed to, which devices have been bought, etc. You can use Notion to do various filtering and classification easily, and then with the colourful tags, I have to repeat it is pleasing to the eye.
So why don’t I use it for taking notes? Because the most annoying thing about Notion is that although it is block-based, it is not easy to filter content by blocks. For example, if I note a TODO on one page and another TODO on another page, I don’t have a good way to put them all together.
The most suitable granularity of notes is a paragraph, so I prefer outline apps, such as Workflowy and Roam, where each node is a block. It’s easy to filter using tags. And without interrupting your workflow. For example, if you write a daily note and a good idea pops into your head, you can write it down and put a #IDEA tag on it. In the future, you can filter by IDEA to bring all the ideas together without worrying about forgetting them. But Notion has no block-level tags, so to speak, there are no global-level tags. Filtering at the block level by tags guarantees that I can find notes when I need them, so this is a feature I value very much.
I recently discovered a new app called Anytype that seems to solve this problem very well. To put it simply, the structure of Notion is that the page contains blocks, and the structure of Anytype is blocks. Of course, it is called Object in Anytype. For example, a task is an object, and you can aggregate all the tasks together by simply filtering the objects with the type is Task. But Anytype is still in a very early stage of development, and we don’t know what the future holds.
To use Notion well, you have to rely on templates. Templates include predefined styles, workflows, and so many other things that some templates can be more expensive than Notion. As a result, Notion is about to become an operating system, and these templates have become APPs. For example, if you need a GTD system, most people can’t handle it, so they can only find a template to build it. The effect of using it depends on the template. Instead, why don’t I use professional GTD software like Things? In comparison, I would definitely trust the professional GTD software.
Notion is a database application, and collaboration tool for me, and another use can be personal portal. You can put all your focuses on one page of Notion and classify them, such as your project, research field, recipe, etc., and then go to different pages or systems to deal with different things separately. However, unfortunately, Notion does not support URL Schema yet.
There is no denying that Notion is still the most comprehensive tool available, and another versatile tool that is also very popular is Obsidian.


The advantage of Obsidian is two things, lots of features and lots of plugins.
First, there are many plugins. I just checked it, and there are 531 plugins. However, many plugins are not always an advantage. The community contributes to the development of plugins, and the quality is naturally uneven. Developers’ skills or API functions often limit many plugins, and the effect achieved is only usable rather than pleasing to use.
Secondly, there are many features, even the recording function. One feature I use a lot that you’ve probably never heard of is multi-cursors. Hold down the Option key and click. You can have multiple cursors, which is very useful in batch operations. Another commonly used function is Footnote, which comes from a plugin. Just press a shortcut, and you can directly start typing footnote content.
So Obsidian is a toolbox-like application for me, and it would be perfect if it could support publishing to blog sites.
But there are also two drawbacks. One is more metaphysical. It is difficult for me to immerse and take notes and write things with it. This reminds me of the development team’s previous product, Dynalist. I also talked about it in an earlier video of mine. I remember that I was using Workflowy at the time, but I couldn’t insert pictures. I wanted to find an alternative, so I found Dynalist. At that time, Dynalist was so much more powerful than Workflowy and met almost all my needs, but I just didn’t feel that I can write more things in it like Workflowy. Is this a side effect of being too feature-rich?
In fact, these two disadvantages are not the point. The point is Obsidian’s block operation. After all, it is Markdown files, which is why many people like it, but it is not convenient to operate as an outline, and it is not convenient to use block references and embedding operations.
But there is one software that solves this problem perfectly: LogSeq.


LogSeq is also based on Markdown files but provides an outline-like operation experience. There are no obvious shortcomings in functionality either, making it a great alternative to Roam. Since it is also based on Markdown files, it can be used with Obsidian to complement its strengths and weaknesses. For example, Obsidian’s integration with Readwise, MarginNote, and the Kanban plugin can complement LogSeq’s shortcomings.
The only concern is that LogSeq is still in the beta development stage, and there are still bugs in performance and data stability. And I once experienced a data loss. That’s one of the main reasons I’m wavering between LogSeq and Roam. Hope it will release the official version soon.


Roam, the originator of the bi-link notes craze, is naturally well finished and does an excellent job with the feature details. For example, its version feature is suitable for writing and recording different ideas for the same problem. Another relatively good detail feature is the comment, which allows you to add additional notes for each piece without affecting the whole page content layout. If I write scripts in Roam, I will record all my references using the comments feature, and LogSeq also has a plugin that does almost the same thing.
But the biggest problem with Roam is that it’s expensive, which is actually kind of my problem. If I don’t care about money, I’ll probably stick with Roam. After all, it recently introduced end-to-end encryption, solving the privacy problem that many people criticize. The performance is not bad, feeling second only to Workflowy.


Since we’re talking about Workflowy, let’s say a few words about this old-fashioned outliner app. I still think Workflowy is one of the most stable and silky smooth outliner apps. I’ve been using it off and on for years, and I’ve never lost a note. Speaking of silky smooth, you can feel the performance gap with other apps when you expand tens of thousands of nodes simultaneously and then roll them quickly. Another point is that Workflowy has powerful queries and even can search notes by the font color.
So why not use it again? On the one hand, it does not support Markdown, which will make it more difficult to migrate data in the future. In the past, it was fine, but since implementing the bi-link feature, the migration is more complicated. After you create a lot of bi-link notes, it will be difficult to leave the software. In addition, the development team is recently busy developing collaboration features, which I do not need. As for some of the detailed features I need, I guess I won’t be able to wait for them in the short term.
So, the note-taking software I use now is Roam, but I will not renew it. Which one should I choose next? Check it out when it expires this month.
Marc Andreessen once said, “One of my all-time favorite guilty pleasures is indulging in productivity porn.” Take it out and share it with you. Please don’t fall into the tool myth and ignore our original purpose is to take notes.
What is the most important thing about note-taking? It’s not how perfectly organized the notes are or how advanced the notes app is, but start writing.

I’m Axton, an entrepreneur and a content creator. I believe in the power of delivering value to you, the reader. If you like this sharing please share it with one of your friends. You can also find me on Twitter and on my Chinese Blog

Read more

Jina Reader API 的四种用法 | 「智图派」

Jina Reader API 的四种用法 | 「智图派」

构建知识库,或者分析各种文章数据,是大家使用 AI 很重要的一个应用场景,因此我们常常会需要用到爬虫去爬取某个网站上的内容,现在,Jina 推出了一款非常简单好用的获取网页内容的工具,你只要把网址给它,它就能把网页内容整理成很适合大语言模型使用的格式,简直是构建知识库的利器。今天我就给大家介绍四种用法。分别包括在自动化工作流中使用以及在 AI 智能体中使用。 Jina Reader API 的网址是 读取器 API,你可以直接输入你需要爬取内容的网址 URL 在这边进行测试,输入之后直接点击按钮「获取内容」,就可以在右边得到结果了。 而他的用法也很简单,就是把你需要爬取内容的网页的 URL 写在 的后面就可以了。 什么是 Reader API Reader 是将任何URL转换为LLM友好的输入,只需简单添加前缀 无需付费即可获得改进后的适用于智能体或 RAG 系统的输出。

lock-1 By Axton
Coze 工作流获取 Tweets 详解 | 「智图派」

Coze 工作流获取 Tweets 详解 | 「智图派」

Coze是一个可以不用代码来搭建AI聊天机器人的平台。我在这期视频当中已经详细地讲解了Coze的各种功能,以及如何用到GPT-4 Turbo的模型。感兴趣的朋友可以回看一下。 自从 Twitter 被马斯克买了之后,如果你想从 Twitter 网站的外面来获取推文信息,也就是用 Twitter API,就需要每个月充值100美元了。但是 Coze 却很大方地让你可以免费地用部分 Twitter API 的功能了。今天我就先给大家演示一个可以批量获取多个 Twitter 作者的推文的工作流,把这个工作流嵌入到你的 AI 聊天机器人里面。比如我这里加了两个 Twitter 账号,我的和马斯克的,这样就可以一次性地获取到我们两个人的推文了。 今天我首先给大家演示一下在 Coze 上可以用到的 Twitter API 的功能,然后再演示一下批量获取推文的工作流,最后我们再聊一聊 Coze 的局限性。 Plugins 的基本功能 getUsers 首先第一个 "get users"

lock-1 By Axton
建立微信 AI 工作流 | 支持 10000 个文件,Assistants API v2 发布 | AI 快讯20240418

建立微信 AI 工作流 | 支持 10000 个文件,Assistants API v2 发布 | AI 快讯20240418

点击进入「AI 精英学院」,做一个会 AI 的人- 新视频发布:微信如何通过 Make 与 GPT、Claude、知识库无缝集成 - 支持 10000 个文件,Assistants API v2 发布 - 我们需要为生物技术的“ChatGPT时刻”做好准备 - NVIDIA推出基于安培架构的两款新GPU,RTX A400和RTX A1000 - Google地图将利用AI帮助您找到隐蔽的电动车充电器 微信如何通过 Make 与 GPT、Claude、知识库无缝集成 没想到海外的自动化平台居然也支持微信公众号。Make 工作流自动化平台,不但支持微信,还支持的挺完善,确实有些让人意外。本期视频演示如何使用 Make 获取微信公众号信息、与 OpenAI 知识库联动、

By Axton
DALL.E 推出图像编辑以及风格推荐功能 | Sora 再现竞争对手 | AI 快讯20240404

DALL.E 推出图像编辑以及风格推荐功能 | Sora 再现竞争对手 | AI 快讯20240404

点击进入「AI 精英学院」,做一个会 AI 的人- DALL.E 推出图像编辑以及风格推荐功能 - “多次尝试破解”:实验室揭示AI安全特性如何被轻松绕过 - 前Snap AI负责人推出Higgsfield,挑战OpenAI的Sora - MIT研究人员开发新计算技术以简化蛋白质工程化过程 使用DALL·E编辑图片 原文链接:Editing your images with DALL·E | OpenAI Help Center OpenAI 的推文包含两项功能的视频演示: You can also get inspiration on styles when creating images in the DALL·E GPT.

By Axton